Vidhya Devi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Vidhya Devi vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 08, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1049056

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1049056
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 08, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vidhya Devi

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no ::585. / 2013 vidya devi and others versus state of madhya pradesh and another 08.05.2013. shri a.p.pandey for the petitioners.shri sanjay dwivedi, government advocate, for state. petitioners have filed this writ petition challenging certain order passed by collector, jabalpur in a revenue case with regard to their bhumiswami rights. it is the case of the petitioners that the order has been passed without hearing them and, therefore, is not maintainable. records indicate that challenging the same order passed by the collector, petitioners had filed w.p.no.15782/2012 before this court and vide order-dated 5.11.2012 - annexure p/4, a bench of this court adverted to consider the question and found that against the order impugned, petitioners have a remedy of appeal under section 44 and revision under section 50 and holding that a petition directly before this court without taking recours.to the remedy available is not permissible, the petition was dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to take recours.to the remedy available as indicated in the order. instead of taking recours.to the said remedy, petitioners have again filed this writ petition and it is canvassed that as opportunity of hearing was not granted, interference be made. once a writ petition challenging the same order was dismissed by a coordinate bench of this court, no further indulgence into the matter is called for. if the petitioners have any grievance, they should have sought recall or review of the order passed on 5.11.2012, in w.p.no.15782/2012, or challenged it by filing a writ appeal. 2 writ petition no ::585. / 2013 vidya devi and others versus state of madhya pradesh and another so long as the said order subsists, interference into a subsequent petition is not called for. finding this petition to be not maintainable, for the reasons as are indicated hereinabove, the same is dismissed. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No ::

585. / 2013 Vidya Devi and others versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another 08.05.2013.

Shri A.P.Pandey for the petitioneRs.Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, Government Advocate, for State.

Petitioners have filed this writ petition challenging certain order passed by Collector, Jabalpur in a revenue case with regard to their Bhumiswami rights.

It is the case of the petitioners that the order has been passed without hearing them and, therefore, is not maintainable.

Records indicate that challenging the same order passed by the Collector, petitioners had filed W.P.No.15782/2012 before this Court and vide order-dated 5.11.2012 - Annexure P/4, a Bench of this Court adverted to consider the question and found that against the order impugned, petitioners have a remedy of appeal under section 44 and revision under section 50 and holding that a petition directly before this Court without taking recouRs.to the remedy available is not permissible, the petition was dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to take recouRs.to the remedy available as indicated in the order.

Instead of taking recouRs.to the said remedy, petitioners have again filed this writ petition and it is canvassed that as opportunity of hearing was not granted, interference be made.

Once a writ petition challenging the same order was dismissed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, no further indulgence into the matter is called for.

If the petitioners have any grievance, they should have sought recall or review of the order passed on 5.11.2012, in W.P.No.15782/2012, or challenged it by filing a writ appeal.

2 Writ Petition No ::

585. / 2013 Vidya Devi and others versus State of Madhya Pradesh and another So long as the said order subsists, interference into a subsequent petition is not called for.

Finding this petition to be not maintainable, for the reasons as are indicated hereinabove, the same is dismissed.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Vidhya Devi vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition