Anil Vs. Smt. Mamta

Anil vs Smt. Mamta

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 13, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048944

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1048944
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 13, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil

Advocate Shri. Wakeel Khan

Respondent

Smt. Mamta

Excerpt

1....m.c.c.no.754 o”13. 7.2012 shri wakeel khan, counsel for the applicant. ms.aparna singh, counsel for the respondents. this application is filed for restoration of f.a.283/2008 which was dismissed in default because of non-compliance of a peremptory order dated 7.10.2009. this application is barred by limitation of near about three years.for which applicant has filed another application i.a.7343/12 under section 5 of limitation act. considering the fact that the default was in respect of non-furnishing the list of documents to be included in the paper book, we find it appropriate to allow both the applications but because of inordinate delay in filing this application we find it appropriate to impose cost of rs.1,000/- on the applicant which shall be paid by the applicant to the non-applicant by money order. the applicant shall make payment of the aforesaid cost by payment of the aforesaid amount through money order or pay order payable on the name of the non-applicant and not furnishing documentary proof inthis regard in the registry within a period of one week from todaym office to restore f.a.283/2008 to its number and to place it before an appropriate bench. in case the aforesaid order is not complied with, earlier order of dismissal of the appeal shall stand. this mcc is finally disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt. vimla jain) judge judge 2....m.c.c.no.754 o”13. 7.2012 vj

Full Judgment

1....M.C.C.No.754 o”

13. 7.2012 Shri Wakeel Khan, Counsel for the applicant.

Ms.Aparna Singh, Counsel for the respondents.

This application is filed for restoration of F.A.283/2008 which was dismissed in default because of non-compliance of a peremptory order dated 7.10.2009.

This application is barred by limitation of near about three yeaRs.for which applicant has filed another application I.A.7343/12 under Section 5 of Limitation Act.

Considering the fact that the default was in respect of non-furnishing the list of documents to be included in the paper book, we find it appropriate to allow both the applications but because of inordinate delay in filing this application we find it appropriate to impose cost of Rs.1,000/- on the applicant which shall be paid by the applicant to the non-applicant by money order.

The applicant shall make payment of the aforesaid cost by payment of the aforesaid amount through Money Order or Pay order payable on the name of the non-applicant and not furnishing documentary proof inthis regard in the Registry within a period of one week from todaym office to restore F.A.283/2008 to its number and to place it before an appropriate Bench.

In case the aforesaid order is not complied with, earlier order of dismissal of the appeal shall stand.

This MCC is finally disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.

Vimla Jain) Judge Judge 2....M.C.C.No.754 o”

13. 7.2012 vj

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Anil vs Smt. Mamta Same Subject Land Acquisition