Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vinod Kumar Singhai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Vinod Kumar Singhai vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 25, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048894

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinod Kumar Singhai

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no ::6194. / 2012 vinot kumar singhai versus state of mp and others 25.03.2013. shri l.s.singh, senior advocate, with shri j.l.soni for the petitioner. shri jaideep singh, government advocate, for the state. shri sanjeev mishra and shri swapnil sohgaura for respondent nos.5 and 6. learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move the appropriate authority for seeking a reference under section 18 of the land acquisition act. permission granted. if an application is filed under section 18, seeking reference, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law. with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No ::

6194. / 2012 Vinot Kumar Singhai versus State of MP and others 25.03.2013.

Shri L.S.Singh, Senior Advocate, with Shri J.L.Soni for the petitioner.

Shri Jaideep Singh, Government Advocate, for the State.

Shri Sanjeev Mishra and Shri Swapnil Sohgaura for respondent Nos.5 and 6.

Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move the appropriate authority for seeking a reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act.

Permission granted.

If an application is filed under section 18, seeking reference, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial