Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Naresh Kumar Digarra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Naresh Kumar Digarra vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 08, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048722

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naresh Kumar Digarra

Advocate Shri. Himanshu Khare

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

naresh kumar digarra versus state of m.p.& ors.1 writ petition no.16651 ”8. 10.2012: shri himanshu khare, learned counsel for the petitioner. petitioner is working as samvida shala shikshak, grade-ii. petitioner claims his amalgamation on the post of adhyapak sambarg in view of policies and circulars of the state government, and on the basis of the qualifying diploma in teaching. from the records it is seen that claim made by the petitioner for amalgamation is pending before the competent authority the collector, respondent no.2, and in that view of the matter for the present without interfering into controvers.on merit respondent no.2 is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for amalgamation as prayed for and pass appropriate orders on the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. the petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge ss*

Full Judgment

Naresh Kumar Digarra versus State of M.P.& ORS.1 Writ Petition No.16651 ”

8. 10.2012: Shri Himanshu Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner is working as Samvida Shala Shikshak, Grade-II.

Petitioner claims his amalgamation on the post of Adhyapak Sambarg in view of policies and circulars of the State Government, and on the basis of the qualifying diploma in teaching.

From the records it is seen that claim made by the petitioner for amalgamation is pending before the competent authority the Collector, respondent No.2, and in that view of the matter for the present without interfering into controveRs.on merit respondent No.2 is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for amalgamation as prayed for and pass appropriate orders on the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

The petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss*

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial