Brajesh Kumar Upadhya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Brajesh Kumar Upadhya vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 08, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048712

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1048712
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 08, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Brajesh Kumar Upadhya

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ appeal 1042/2012 8.10.2012 ms.malti dadariya, advocate for appellant. shri vijay pandey, deputy advocate general for the respondents. this appeal is directed against an order dated 23.8.2012 in writ petition no.22034/2011(s).which was dismissed on merits. learned counsel for the appellant after arguing the matter at length submits that she may be permitted to withdraw this appeal with liberty to challenge the order of repatriation, if passed in the matter of appellant in future, on its own merits. prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents hence it is allowed. appellant is permitted to withdraw this appeal with liberty as prayed. it is however made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter and parties shall be free to agitate their contentions in case any such fresh petition is filed by the appellant. no order as to costs. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt.vimla jain) judge judge amit

Full Judgment

Writ Appeal 1042/2012 8.10.2012 Ms.Malti Dadariya, Advocate for appellant.

Shri Vijay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents.

This appeal is directed against an order dated 23.8.2012 in Writ Petition No.22034/2011(S).which was dismissed on merits.

Learned counsel for the appellant after arguing the matter at length submits that she may be permitted to withdraw this appeal with liberty to challenge the order of repatriation, if passed in the matter of appellant in future, on its own merits.

Prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for the respondents hence it is allowed.

Appellant is permitted to withdraw this appeal with liberty as prayed.

It is however made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the matter and parties shall be free to agitate their contentions in case any such fresh petition is filed by the appellant.

No order as to costs.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) Judge Judge amit

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Brajesh Kumar Upadhya vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education