Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chhotu Khan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Chhotu Khan vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 08, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048708

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chhotu Khan

Advocate Shri. Ashok Kumar Gupta

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no.15689/201”08. 10.2012 shri ashok kumar gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri s.m.lal, learned govt. advocate for respondents-state, on advance copy. heard on the question of admission. it is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the law laid down by the full bench of this court in the case of vishnu mutiya & others versus state of m.p.& others [2006 (1) mplj 23 .as also in the case of ram naresh pathak versus state of m.p.[w.p.no.13520/2006(s)].and the bunch of cases decided on 25.9.2006, the petitioner is entitled to 50% back wages of the period when he was not continued in the employment on account of making application of a circular and retiring the petitioner on completion of 30 years of service or attaining the age of 60 years.it is contended that the petitioner though is reinstated in service, such wages have not been paid to him. considering the law laid down by this court in the case of vishnu mutiya (supra).this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to grant similar benefits to the petitioner as has been extended by this court in the aforesaid cases and to pay 50% back wages for the period of absence of the petitioner as is claimed by him, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today. writ petition no.15689/2012 2 with the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of finally. certified copy as per rules. (k.k.trivedi) judge skc

Full Judgment

WRIT PETITION No.15689/201”

08. 10.2012 Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri S.M.Lal, learned Govt.

Advocate for respondents-State, on advance copy.

Heard on the question of admission.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Vishnu Mutiya & others versus State of M.P.& others [2006 (1) MPLJ 23 .as also in the case of Ram Naresh Pathak versus State of M.P.[W.P.No.13520/2006(S)].and the bunch of cases decided on 25.9.2006, the petitioner is entitled to 50% back wages of the period when he was not continued in the employment on account of making application of a circular and retiring the petitioner on completion of 30 years of service or attaining the age of 60 yeaRs.It is contended that the petitioner though is reinstated in service, such wages have not been paid to him.

Considering the law laid down by this Court in the case of Vishnu Mutiya (supra).this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to grant similar benefits to the petitioner as has been extended by this Court in the aforesaid cases and to pay 50% back wages for the period of absence of the petitioner as is claimed by him, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order passed today.

WRIT PETITION No.15689/2012 2 With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of finally.

Certified copy as per rules.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial