Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deepak Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Deepak vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 08, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048704

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.5254/2012 8/10/2012 shri amit jain, advocate for the applicant. shri a.k.shukla, ga for the respondent/state. heard finally. this is the firs.bail application filed by applicant under section 439 of the cr.p.c for grant of bail. the applicant has been arrested on 2/02/2012 in connection with crime no.192/2011 registered at p.s.bhangarh, district sagar for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201/34, 120-b of ipc and sections 25/27 of the arms act. learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. it is further submitted that other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail therefore, he prays for bail to this applicant. learned counsel for the state submits that as per fsl report the empty kartoos found on spot was fired from the gun seized from the possession of this applicant therefore, he prays for dismissal of the application. considering the overall facts and evidence on record alongwith the fsl report wherein prima facie evidence that empty kartoos was fired from the gun seized from the possession of this applicant, i am of the view that it is not a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant at this stage. accordingly, this application filed u/s 439 of cr.p.c.for grant of bail is hereby dismissed. (g.s.solanki) judge navin

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.5254/2012 8/10/2012 Shri Amit Jain, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri A.K.Shukla, GA for the respondent/State.

Heard finally.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C for grant of bail.

The applicant has been arrested on 2/02/2012 in connection with Crime No.192/2011 registered at P.S.Bhangarh, District Sagar for the offence punishable under sections 302, 201/34, 120-B of IPC and sections 25/27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case.

It is further submitted that other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail therefore, he prays for bail to this applicant.

Learned counsel for the State submits that as per FSL report the empty kartoos found on spot was fired from the gun seized from the possession of this applicant therefore, he prays for dismissal of the application.

Considering the overall facts and evidence on record alongwith the FSL report wherein prima facie evidence that empty kartoos was fired from the gun seized from the possession of this applicant, I am of the view that it is not a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant at this stage.

Accordingly, this application filed u/s 439 of Cr.P.C.for grant of bail is hereby dismissed.

(G.S.SOLANKI) Judge navin

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial