Rajendra Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Rajendra Sharma vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Oct 08, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048639

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1048639
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Oct 08, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajendra Sharma

Advocate Smt. Sudha Gautam

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

rajendra sharma & anr. versus state & ors.w.p.no.9114/2012 09/10/2012 smt. sudha gautam, learned counsel for the petitioners.petitioners were candidates, who had appeared in the test conducted for appointment on the post of samvida shala shikshak grade-iii. grievance of the petitioner is that for the degree of d.ed. held by the petitioners.they are entitled to 20 marks in accordance with madhya pradesh panchayat samvida shala shikshak (employment and conditions) of contract rules, 2005 and as the aforesaid marks are not granted to the petitioners.this writ petition has been filed, when representations in this regard did not yield any result. keeping in view the aforesaid grievance of the petitioners and an order dated 31.8.2012 passed under similar circumstances in w.p.no.13852/2012(s) (megha gontiya versus state & ors.).the competent authority is directed to decide the representations of the petitioners in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of three weeks' from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter and it is for the competent authority to decide the representation as indicated hereinabove. with the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge nd

Full Judgment

Rajendra Sharma & Anr.

versus State & ORS.W.P.No.9114/2012 09/10/2012 Smt.

Sudha Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Petitioners were candidates, who had appeared in the test conducted for appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade-III.

Grievance of the petitioner is that for the degree of D.Ed.

held by the petitioneRs.they are entitled to 20 marks in accordance with Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Samvida Shala Shikshak (Employment and Conditions) of Contract Rules, 2005 and as the aforesaid marks are not granted to the petitioneRs.this writ petition has been filed, when representations in this regard did not yield any result.

Keeping in view the aforesaid grievance of the petitioners and an order dated 31.8.2012 passed under similar circumstances in W.P.No.13852/2012(s) (Megha Gontiya versus State & Ors.).the competent authority is directed to decide the representations of the petitioners in accordance with law by a speaking order within a period of three weeks' from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter and it is for the competent authority to decide the representation as indicated hereinabove.

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

Certified Copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge nd

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Rajendra Sharma vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education