Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deepak Vs. Santosh

Deepak vs Santosh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 26, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048500

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak

Respondent

Santosh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.8526/2013 26.07.2013 shri imtiaz husain, advocate for the applicant. heard. applicant/accused has filed this petition under section 482 of cr.p.c.against the order dated 13.6.2013 whereby the application filed by the applicant under section 91 of cr.p.c.for summoning the police record in respect of the report made by him for loss of cheque book was rejected. on perusal of order though i find no error in the order, but if applicant moves such an application at the stage when he enters into his defence, such an application shall be considered by the trial court according to law. subject to above observation, this petition is disposed of. (rakesh saksena) judge b

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.8526/2013 26.07.2013 Shri Imtiaz Husain, Advocate for the applicant.

Heard.

Applicant/accused has filed this petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C.against the order dated 13.6.2013 whereby the application filed by the applicant under section 91 of Cr.P.C.for summoning the police record in respect of the report made by him for loss of cheque book was rejected.

On perusal of order though I find no error in the order, but if applicant moves such an application at the stage when he enters into his defence, such an application shall be considered by the trial Court according to law.

Subject to above observation, this petition is disposed of.

(Rakesh Saksena) Judge b

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial