Vinay Shukla Vs. M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board

Vinay Shukla vs M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 21, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048461

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1048461
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Dec 21, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinay Shukla

Advocate Shri. S. Chakravarty

Respondent

M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board

Excerpt

w.p.no.21597 / 2012 (vinay shukla ..vs..m.p.housing and infrastructure development board, bhopal & anr.) 21-12-2012 heard shri s. chakravarty, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. the petitioner has filed this petition praying that the representation (annexure p-4).dated 16-11-2011, filed by the petitioner before the respondent/authorities be directed to be considered and decided by the respondent/authorities. in the circumstances, looking to the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner furnishes a copy of the order passed today along with a copy of the petition to the respondent/authorities within seven days of obtaining the same, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's aforesaid representation, dated 16-11-2011 in accordance with law expeditiously. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the concerned authority, while deciding the petitioner's aforesaid representation, would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same. with the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of. certified copy today. (r.s.jha) judge mct

Full Judgment

W.P.No.21597 / 2012 (Vinay Shukla ..Vs..M.P.Housing and Infrastructure Development Board, Bhopal & anr.) 21-12-2012 Heard Shri S.

Chakravarty, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission.

The petitioner has filed this petition praying that the representation (Annexure P-4).dated 16-11-2011, filed by the petitioner before the respondent/authorities be directed to be considered and decided by the respondent/authorities.

In the circumstances, looking to the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner furnishes a copy of the order passed today along with a copy of the petition to the respondent/authorities within seven days of obtaining the same, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's aforesaid representation, dated 16-11-2011 in accordance with law expeditiously.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the concerned authority, while deciding the petitioner's aforesaid representation, would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same.

With the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of.

Certified copy today.

(R.S.Jha) Judge mct

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Vinay Shukla vs M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development B... Same Subject Education