Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vinay Shukla Vs. M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board

Vinay Shukla vs M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 21, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048461
CiteSignal

Log in to get a daily email when new judgments cite this order.

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinay Shukla

Respondent

M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Part of AI Studio: get a comprehensive 18-section AI Brief and case-scoped chat on this judgment, plus Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind from the AI Studio hub.

Log in to unlock AI Studio

Subscribers get structured AI Briefs and case-scoped chat. Learn more.

Excerpt

.....furnishes a copy of the order passed today along with a copy of the petition to the respondent/authorities within seven days of obtaining the same, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's aforesaid representation, dated 16-11-2011 in accordance with law expeditiously. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the concerned authority, while deciding the petitioner's aforesaid representation, would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same. with the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of. certified copy today. (r.s.jha) judge mct

Full Judgment

W.P.No.21597 / 2012 (Vinay Shukla ..Vs..M.P.Housing and Infrastructure Development Board, Bhopal & anr.) 21-12-2012 Heard Shri S.

Chakravarty, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission.

The petitioner has filed this petition praying that the representation (Annexure P-4).dated 16-11-2011, filed by the petitioner before the respondent/authorities be directed to be considered and decided by the respondent/authorities.

In the circumstances, looking to the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner furnishes a copy of the order passed today along with a copy of the petition to the respondent/authorities within seven days of obtaining the same, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's aforesaid representation, dated 16-11-2011 in accordance with law expeditiously.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the concerned authority, while deciding the petitioner's aforesaid representation, would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same.

With the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of.

Certified copy today.

(R.S.Jha) Judge mct


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial