Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Madhur Kumar Shrivastava Vs. M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board,

Madhur Kumar Shrivastava vs M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board,

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 21, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048431

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Madhur Kumar Shrivastava

Advocate Shri. S. Chakravarty

Respondent

M.P. Housing and Infrastructure Development Board,

Excerpt

w.p.no.21595 / 2012 (madhur kumar shrivastava..vs..m.p.housing and infrastructure development board, bhopal & anr.) 21-12-2012 heard shri s. chakravarty, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission. the petitioner has filed this petition praying that the representation (annexure p-4).dated 21-11-2011, filed by the petitioner before the respondent/authorities be directed to be considered and decided by the respondent/authorities. in the circumstances, looking to the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner furnishes a copy of the order passed today along with a copy of the petition to the respondent/authorities within seven days of obtaining the same, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's aforesaid representation, dated 21-11-2011 in accordance with law expeditiously. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the concerned authority, while deciding the petitioner's aforesaid representation, would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same. with the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of. certified copy today. (r.s.jha) judge mct

Full Judgment

W.P.No.21595 / 2012 (Madhur Kumar Shrivastava..Vs..M.P.Housing and Infrastructure Development Board, Bhopal & anr.) 21-12-2012 Heard Shri S.

Chakravarty, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission.

The petitioner has filed this petition praying that the representation (Annexure P-4).dated 21-11-2011, filed by the petitioner before the respondent/authorities be directed to be considered and decided by the respondent/authorities.

In the circumstances, looking to the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner furnishes a copy of the order passed today along with a copy of the petition to the respondent/authorities within seven days of obtaining the same, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the petitioner's aforesaid representation, dated 21-11-2011 in accordance with law expeditiously.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the concerned authority, while deciding the petitioner's aforesaid representation, would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same.

With the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioners stands disposed of.

Certified copy today.

(R.S.Jha) Judge mct

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial