Suresh Kumar Katare Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Suresh Kumar Katare vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 15, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048336

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1048336
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 15, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suresh Kumar Katare

Advocate Shri. J.P. Dhimole

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 writ petition no. 8697 of 2013 15.5.2013 shri sanjay seth, learned counsel with shri j.p. dhimole, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri samdarshi tiwari, learned government advocate for respondent state on advance notice. petitioner, a retired sports officer, having retired on attaining the age of superannuation w.e.f. 28.2.2003 vide this petition seeks direction to respondents to revise the pay of the petitioner in terms of clause 3 (a) (one) of circular dated 11.10.1999. it is observed from record that one r.s. shrivastava had preferred a writ petition before this court vide w.p. no. 19933/2003 which was decided on 27.4.2010; wherein while taking into consideration the claim putforth direction was issued to the respondents to examine his case in light of clause 3 (a) (one) of circular dated 11.10.1999 for grant of one advance increment. to maintain parity, this petition is also disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of benefit as per clause 3 (a) (one) of circular dated 11th october 1999 and if found eligible, at par with r.s. shrivastava, to extend the same within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order. c.c as per rules. (sanjay yadav) judge vt

Full Judgment

1 Writ Petition No. 8697 Of 2013 15.5.2013 Shri Sanjay Seth, learned counsel with Shri J.P. Dhimole, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for respondent State on advance notice.

Petitioner, a retired Sports Officer, having retired on attaining the age of superannuation w.e.f. 28.2.2003 vide this petition seeks direction to respondents to revise the pay of the petitioner in terms of clause 3 (A) (one) of circular dated 11.10.1999.

It is observed from record that one R.S. Shrivastava had preferred a writ petition before this Court vide W.P. No. 19933/2003 which was decided on 27.4.2010; wherein while taking into consideration the claim putforth direction was issued to the respondents to examine his case in light of clause 3 (A) (one) of circular dated 11.10.1999 for grant of one advance increment.

To maintain parity, this petition is also disposed of with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of benefit as per Clause 3 (A) (One) of circular dated 11th October 1999 and if found eligible, at par with R.S. Shrivastava, to extend the same within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order.

C.c as per rules.

(SANJAY YADAV) JUDGE VT

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Suresh Kumar Katare vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education