Manish Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Manish Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 15, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048316

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1048316
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 15, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manish Kumar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no ::9164. / 2013 manish kumar versus state of madhya pradesh and others 15.05.2013. shri b.k.bais for the petitioner. shri vivek agrawal, government advocate, for the state on advance notice. petitioner is only claiming solatium and interest in accordance to the provisions of section 23-a of the land acquisition act, on the ground that the same has not been granted in the award passed by the land acquisition officer. if that be so, petitioner has a remedy of seeking reference under section 18. it is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application under section 18 has been filed before the land acquisition officer. accordingly, the competent authority is directed to consider and decide the application filed under section 18, for reference to the district judge in accordance to law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. with the aforesaid, the petition stands allowed and disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No ::

9164. / 2013 Manish Kumar versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others 15.05.2013.

Shri B.K.Bais for the petitioner.

Shri Vivek Agrawal, Government Advocate, for the State on advance notice.

Petitioner is only claiming solatium and interest in accordance to the provisions of section 23-A of the Land Acquisition Act, on the ground that the same has not been granted in the award passed by the Land Acquisition Officer.

If that be so, petitioner has a remedy of seeking reference under section 18.

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that an application under section 18 has been filed before the Land Acquisition Officer.

Accordingly, the competent authority is directed to consider and decide the application filed under section 18, for reference to the District Judge in accordance to law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the petition stands allowed and disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Manish Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition