Mohammad Idris Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Mohammad Idris vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jun 16, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048304

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1048304
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jun 16, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohammad Idris

Advocate Shri. B.K.Bais

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 writ petition no.9081/13. 17.6.2013 . shri b.k.bais, learned counsel for the petitioner. the petitioner has filed this petition under article 226 of the constitution of india for appropriate direction to decide the revenue case on some early date within time bound schedule. it is apparent fact on record that in entire petition the particulars and the number of such revenue case, which is said to be pending before the tahsildar has not been stated in any manner. in the lack of such material particulars this petition could not be entertained for any purpose. consequently, the same is hereby dismissed. however, petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh petition in this regard by mentioning all necessary particulars in the same.c.c. as per rules. (u. c.maheshwari) judge k

Full Judgment

1 Writ Petition No.9081/13.

17.6.2013 .

Shri B.K.Bais, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for appropriate direction to decide the revenue case on some early date within time bound schedule.

It is apparent fact on record that in entire petition the particulars and the number of such revenue case, which is said to be pending before the Tahsildar has not been stated in any manner.

In the lack of such material particulars this petition could not be entertained for any purpose.

Consequently, the same is hereby dismissed.

However, petitioner shall be at liberty to file fresh petition in this regard by mentioning all necessary particulars in the same.C.C.

as per rules.

(U.

C.Maheshwari) Judge k

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Mohammad Idris vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education