Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Niranjan Singh Vs. Ajay Tirki

Niranjan Singh vs Ajay Tirki

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 30, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048168

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Niranjan Singh

Advocate Shri. Narendra Sharma

Respondent

Ajay Tirki

Excerpt

con. c.no.1071/2012 30.07.2012 shri narendra sharma, learned counsel for the applicant. heard on the question of admission. issue show cause to non-applicants no.2 to 5 as to why contempt proceedings be not initiated against them for non- compliance of the order dated 19/3/2010 passed in w.p.no.10966/2009 and to furnish wrong information in con. case no.1299/2010 which was disposed of on the basis of the said information on 21/4/2011. notice be issuing indicating the aforesaid fact to the non-applicants, on payment of p.f.within three days. notice be made returnable within four weeks. list this case on 10th september, 2012 for further orders.(j.k.maheshwari) judge ts

Full Judgment

Con.

C.No.1071/2012 30.07.2012 Shri Narendra Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant.

Heard on the question of admission.

Issue show cause to non-applicants No.2 to 5 as to why contempt proceedings be not initiated against them for non- compliance of the order dated 19/3/2010 passed in W.P.No.10966/2009 and to furnish wrong information in Con.

Case No.1299/2010 which was disposed of on the basis of the said information on 21/4/2011.

Notice be issuing indicating the aforesaid fact to the non-applicants, on payment of P.F.within three days.

Notice be made returnable within four weeks.

List this case on 10th September, 2012 for further ordeRs.(J.K.Maheshwari) Judge ts

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial