Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devraj Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Devraj vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 30, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048134

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devraj

Advocate Shri. V.K.Shukla

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 devraj versus state of mp and another w.p.no.11454/2012 30/07/2012 shri v.k.shukla , learned counsel for the petitioner. petitioner is working as a training superintendent in iti mandla. grievance of the petitioner is that the pay in the time scale of pay of ` 15600+5400 is not paid to the petitioner. records indicate that the state government has approved grant of appropriate pay scale to the petitioner vide orders annexure-p5 & p6 and respondent no.2 is required to take action in the matter. considering the aforesaid, respondent no.2 is directed to pass appropriate orders with regard to grant of pay scale to the petitioner after taking note of the directions issued by the state government vide annexure-p5 & p6. necessary orders be passed within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. with the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge nd 2 devraj versus state of mp and another

Full Judgment

1 Devraj versus State of MP and another W.P.No.11454/2012 30/07/2012 Shri V.K.Shukla , learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner is working as a Training Superintendent in ITI Mandla.

Grievance of the petitioner is that the pay in the Time Scale of Pay of ` 15600+5400 is not paid to the petitioner.

Records indicate that the State Government has approved grant of appropriate pay scale to the petitioner vide orders Annexure-P5 & P6 and Respondent No.2 is required to take action in the matter.

Considering the aforesaid, Respondent No.2 is directed to pass appropriate orders with regard to grant of pay scale to the petitioner after taking note of the directions issued by the State Government vide Annexure-P5 & P6.

Necessary orders be passed within a period of one month from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

Certified Copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge nd 2 Devraj versus State of MP and another

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial