Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devendra Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Devendra vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 30, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048066

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devendra

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

cr.r.no.1408/12 30.7.2012 shri sharad verma, adv.for applicants. shri pushpendra singh,p.l.for respondent /state. with the consent of learned counsel of the parties heard finally. applicants devendra and sunil have been convicted u/s 34(2) of m.p.excise act and sentenced to r.i.for 3 years with fine of rs.25,000/-, in default of fine further r.i.for six months vide judgment and finding dated 16.7.2012 in criminal case no.4492/06 by cj.m.damoh; in cri. appeal no.100/12 vide judgment dated 18.7.12 of fourth addl. sessions judge damoh has dismissed the application for bail in the appeal hence this revision petition for grant of bail to applicants. learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants filed criminal appeal before sessions judge damoh who vide order dated 18.7.2012 rejected the application for suspension of sentence, however, the appeal is still pending. applicant is already in jail since 16.7.2012. in the aforesaid circumstances this revision is allowed. it is directed that jail sentence alone imposed on the applicants devendra and sunil shall remain suspended if they pay the fine and furnish personal bond to the tune of rs.25,000/-each (rs.twenty five thousand only) with a surety bond in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the trial court for their appearance before ivth additional sessions judge, damoh on 13.8.2012 and continue thereafter as may be directed by that court, they be released on bail and the substantive jail sentence shall remain suspended during pendency of appeal. this petition is allowed and disposed of finally. as the criminal revision has been finally disposed of i.a.no.15589/12 stands disposed of as infructuous. certified copy as per rules. (m.a.siddiqui) judge ag/

Full Judgment

Cr.R.No.1408/12 30.7.2012 Shri Sharad Verma, Adv.for applicants.

Shri Pushpendra Singh,P.L.for respondent /State.

With the consent of learned counsel of the parties heard finally.

Applicants Devendra and Sunil have been convicted u/s 34(2) of M.P.Excise Act and sentenced to R.I.for 3 years with fine of Rs.25,000/-, in default of fine further R.I.for six months vide judgment and finding dated 16.7.2012 in Criminal Case no.4492/06 by CJ.M.Damoh; in Cri.

appeal No.100/12 vide judgment dated 18.7.12 of Fourth Addl.

Sessions Judge Damoh has dismissed the application for bail in the appeal hence this revision petition for grant of bail to applicants.

Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants filed criminal appeal before Sessions Judge Damoh who vide order dated 18.7.2012 rejected the application for suspension of sentence, however, the appeal is still pending.

Applicant is already in jail since 16.7.2012.

In the aforesaid circumstances this revision is allowed.

It is directed that jail sentence alone imposed on the applicants Devendra and Sunil shall remain suspended if they pay the fine and furnish personal bond to the tune of Rs.25,000/-each (Rs.Twenty five thousand only) with a surety bond in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for their appearance before IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Damoh on 13.8.2012 and continue thereafter as may be directed by that court, they be released on bail and the substantive jail sentence shall remain suspended during pendency of appeal.

This petition is allowed and disposed of finally.

As the criminal revision has been finally disposed of I.A.No.15589/12 stands disposed of as infructuous.

Certified copy as per rules.

(M.A.SIDDIQUI) JUDGE Ag/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial