Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Phoolchand Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Phoolchand vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 30, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1048024

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Phoolchand

Advocate Shri. R.K.Mishra

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.10059 / 2012 (phoolchand ..vs.state of mp & others.30-07-2012 shri r.k.mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri samdarshi tiwari, learned g.a.for the state/respondents. the petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the respondent/authorities are not disbursing the amount due to the petitioner pursuant to the faloudhyan/horticulture activities undertaken by the petitioner under the gramin rojgar guarantee yojna. it is submitted that the petitioner has already filed representations before the collector, tikamgarh, on 3-4-2012 and 29-5-2012 claiming the said amount but no decision has been taken till date. the learned government advocate, appearing for the state/respondents submits that the aforesaid representations filed by the petitioner shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority expeditiously in accordance with law. in the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner furnishes a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition to the collector, tikamgarh, within 15 days of obtaining the same, the collector shall consider and decide the aforesaid representations filed by the petitioner expeditiously as far as possible within three months thereafter in accordance with law. it is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the concerned authority, while deciding the representation of the petitioner, would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same. with the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (r.s.jha) judge mct

Full Judgment

W.P.No.10059 / 2012 (Phoolchand ..Vs.State of MP & otheRs.30-07-2012 Shri R.K.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned G.A.for the State/respondents.

The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that the respondent/authorities are not disbursing the amount due to the petitioner pursuant to the Faloudhyan/Horticulture activities undertaken by the petitioner under the Gramin Rojgar Guarantee Yojna.

It is submitted that the petitioner has already filed representations before the Collector, Tikamgarh, on 3-4-2012 and 29-5-2012 claiming the said amount but no decision has been taken till date.

The learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondents submits that the aforesaid representations filed by the petitioner shall be considered and decided by the concerned authority expeditiously in accordance with law.

In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner furnishes a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition to the Collector, Tikamgarh, within 15 days of obtaining the same, the Collector shall consider and decide the aforesaid representations filed by the petitioner expeditiously as far as possible within three months thereafter in accordance with law.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the concerned authority, while deciding the representation of the petitioner, would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same.

With the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(R.S.Jha) Judge mct

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial