R.D. Vaishnav Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

R.D. Vaishnav vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 24, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047899

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1047899
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 24, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R.D. Vaishnav

Advocate Shri. D.K.Tripathi

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

writ petition no.10618/200”24. 08.2012 shri d.k.tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri piyush dharmadhikari, learned govt. advocate, for respondents-state. it is stated by learned govt. advocate that the affidavit of the officer-in-charge in compliance of order dated 11.01.2012 has been filed. it is seen that the affidavit is not correct as it is stated in one line that the order was communicated to the officer-in-charge but in the subsequent lines it has been stated that the said communication was not received by him before the date fixed for personal appearance before this court. this being so, learned govt. advocate is directed to file an appropriate affidavit of the officer-in-charge within two weeks. list immediately thereafter. (k.k.trivedi) judge skc

Full Judgment

WRIT PETITION No.10618/200”

24. 08.2012 Shri D.K.Tripathi, learned Counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Govt.

Advocate, for respondents-State.

It is stated by learned Govt.

Advocate that the affidavit of the Officer-in-Charge in compliance of order dated 11.01.2012 has been filed.

It is seen that the affidavit is not correct as it is stated in one line that the order was communicated to the Officer-in-Charge but in the subsequent lines it has been stated that the said communication was not received by him before the date fixed for personal appearance before this Court.

This being so, learned Govt.

Advocate is directed to file an appropriate affidavit of the Officer-in-Charge within two weeks.

List immediately thereafter.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties R.D. Vaishnav vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education