Full Judgment
WRIT PETITION No.9688/201”
24. 08.2012 Shri K.N.Pethia, learned Counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Piyush Dharmadhikari, learned Govt.
Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2.
None for respondents No.3 to 6.
Shri D.K.Dixit, learned Counsel appeared on behalf of Shri Surendra Bajpai and otheRs.who have moved an application to intervene in the writ petition to oppose the same on the ground that after passing of the final order in the present writ petition on earlier occasion, a writ appeal was filed by these interveners stating that they were not granted opportunity of hearing and said writ appeal was allowed by the Division Bench of this Court.
The order passed by the single Bench was set aside and the matter was remanded back to be examined afresh.
Looking to the aforesaid, the application for intervention is allowed.
Let the interveners be impleaded as parties-respondents in the writ petition during the couRs.of the day by making an application for amendment in the cause title, which stood automatically allowed in view of the order passed today.
The notices of the writ petition on behalf of the newly added respondents/interverners are accepted by Shri D.K.Dixit, learned Counsel, who will file the return within four weeks.
The State will also file return and reply to the I.A., an application for condonation of delay.
WRIT PETITION No.9688/2010 2 List the petition for final disposal at motion stage in the week commencing 29th October, 2012.
(K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc