Mathali Sharan Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Mathali Sharan Patel vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Aug 24, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047844

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1047844
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Aug 24, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mathali Sharan Patel

Advocate Shri. A.K.Pathak

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

mathali sharan patel versus state & ors.w.p.no.13918/2012(s) 24/08/2012 shri a.k.pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner. issue notice to the respondents on payment of p.f within one week, returnable in four weeks. considering the fact that the impugned action proposing to cancel the appointment of the petitioner is taken on the ground that the petitioner was involved in certain criminal case but taking note of the fact that before his termination, petitioner was already acquitted by the trial court in the criminal case vide order dated 18.2.2010, prima-facie, action impugned seems to be unsustainable and inspite of the recommendations made in this regard by the divisional forest officer, satna, action impugned annexure-p11 dated 26.7.2012, seems to be unsustainable. in view of the above, further action into the communication dated 26.7.2012 is directed to be stayed and petitioner permitted to work. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge nd

Full Judgment

Mathali Sharan Patel versus State & ors.W.P.No.13918/2012(s) 24/08/2012 Shri A.K.Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Issue notice to the respondents on payment of P.F within one week, returnable in four weeks.

Considering the fact that the impugned action proposing to cancel the appointment of the petitioner is taken on the ground that the petitioner was involved in certain criminal case but taking note of the fact that before his termination, petitioner was already acquitted by the trial court in the criminal case vide order dated 18.2.2010, prima-facie, action impugned seems to be unsustainable and inspite of the recommendations made in this regard by the Divisional Forest Officer, Satna, action impugned Annexure-P11 dated 26.7.2012, seems to be unsustainable.

In view of the above, further action into the communication dated 26.7.2012 is directed to be stayed and petitioner permitted to work.

Certified Copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge nd

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Mathali Sharan Patel vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education