Devdatt Tiwari Vs. Geeta Bai

Devdatt Tiwari vs Geeta Bai

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 31, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047743

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1047743
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 31, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devdatt Tiwari

Advocate Shri. A.D.Mishra

Respondent

Geeta Bai

Excerpt

s.a.no.248/2012 31.07.2012 shri a.d.mishra, learned counsel for the appellant. heard on the question of admission. this appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law : i) whether two courts below committed error to decree the suit without having any proof that the suit property is the ancestral property, however, the finding so recoded in the suit for partition is pervers.?. ii) whether two courts below committed error to declare the registered sale deed executed by chhotibai before partition in favour of appellant on 6/7/2000 as null and void, and the finding so recorded in this respect is unsustainable and pervers.?. issue notice to the respondents, on payment of p.f.within three days. also heard on i.a.no.2450/2012, which is an application for stay. until further orders.status-quo, as exist today, with respect to suit property shall be maintained by the parties. c.c.as per rules. (j.k.maheshwari) judge ts

Full Judgment

S.A.No.248/2012 31.07.2012 Shri A.D.Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant.

Heard on the question of admission.

This appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law : i) Whether two Courts below committed error to decree the suit without having any proof that the suit property is the ancestral property, however, the finding so recoded in the suit for partition is perveRs.?.

ii) Whether two Courts below committed error to declare the registered sale deed executed by Chhotibai before partition in favour of appellant on 6/7/2000 as null and void, and the finding so recorded in this respect is unsustainable and perveRs.?.

Issue notice to the respondents, on payment of P.F.within three days.

Also heard on I.A.No.2450/2012, which is an application for stay.

Until further ordeRs.status-quo, as exist today, with respect to suit property shall be maintained by the parties.

C.C.as per rules.

(J.K.Maheshwari) Judge ts

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Devdatt Tiwari vs Geeta Bai Same Subject Education