Rajkumar Singh and ors. Vs. Pushpendar Singh and ors.

Rajkumar Singh and ors. vs Pushpendar Singh and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 31, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047727

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1047727
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 31, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajkumar Singh and ors.

Advocate Shri. Awinath Patel

Respondent

Pushpendar Singh and ors.

Advocate Shri. G.S.Baghel

Excerpt

fa no.04/1999 31.07.2012 shri awinath patel, learned counsel for the appellants. shri g.s.baghel, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3. none for respondent no.4, although served. shri akhilesh shukla, learned dy. ga for the respondent no.5. after arguing for 10-15 minutes on merits of the matter in response of some query of the court based on section 164 of the m.p.land revenue code 1959, instead to argue further today, appellants' counsel seeks short adjournment to examine some more legal position before making the submissions. let this matter be listed for further arguments in the week commencing 21.8.2012. (u.c.maheshwari) judge bks

Full Judgment

FA No.04/1999 31.07.2012 Shri Awinath Patel, learned counsel for the appellants.

Shri G.S.Baghel, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.

None for respondent No.4, although served.

Shri Akhilesh Shukla, learned Dy.

GA for the respondent no.5.

After arguing for 10-15 minutes on merits of the matter in response of some query of the court based on Section 164 of the M.P.Land Revenue Code 1959, instead to argue further today, appellants' counsel seeks short adjournment to examine some more legal position before making the submissions.

Let this matter be listed for further arguments in the week commencing 21.8.2012.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge bks

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Rajkumar Singh and ors. vs Pushpendar Singh and ors. Same Subject Land Acquisition