Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gulab Bai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Gulab Bai vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 31, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047721

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gulab Bai

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

31.7.2012 shri satyam agrawal, advocate for the applicant. shri chandrakant mishra, ga for the state. this is the firs.bail application filed by the applicant under section 439 of the cr.p.c.for grant of bail. the applicant is in custody since 6.5.2012 in connection with crime no.63/2012 registered at p.s.sanchi, district raisen for the offence punishable under sections 498-a, 304-b/34 of the ipc learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a lady, she has been falsely implicated in the case. she is mother-in- law of deceased laxmi bai. the marriage of laxmi bai was performed with jagdish before 6 years.as per prosecution, the main allegation of committing cruelty is against jagdish. the allegation against the applicant is that she used to pass sarcastic remarks against laxmi bai, due to which she died unnatural death. charge sheet has been filed. the applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, she be released on bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the application. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and the nature of allegation against the applicant, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.35,000/- (rs.thirty five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court for securing her presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Full Judgment

31.7.2012 Shri Satyam Agrawal, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Chandrakant Mishra, GA for the State.

This is the fiRs.bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.for grant of bail.

The applicant is in custody since 6.5.2012 in connection with Crime No.63/2012 registered at P.S.Sanchi, District Raisen for the offence punishable under sections 498-A, 304-B/34 of the IPC Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a lady, she has been falsely implicated in the case.

She is mother-in- law of deceased Laxmi Bai.

The marriage of Laxmi Bai was performed with Jagdish before 6 yeaRs.As per prosecution, the main allegation of committing cruelty is against Jagdish.

The allegation against the applicant is that she used to pass sarcastic remarks against Laxmi Bai, due to which she died unnatural death.

Charge sheet has been filed.

The applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, she be released on bail.

Learned counsel for State has opposed the application.

On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and the nature of allegation against the applicant, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, this application is allowed and it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.35,000/- (Rs.Thirty Five Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal Court/trial Court for securing her presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial