Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pramilesh Kumar Sharma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Pramilesh Kumar Sharma vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 02, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047539

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pramilesh Kumar Sharma

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.3912/2013 2.4.2013 shri neeraj nahar, advocate for the applicant. shri r.k.kesarwani, pl for the state. shri r.k.khare, advocate for the objector. admit. call for the case diary. heard on i.a.no.7178/2013, an application for grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant. the applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with crime no.40/2013 registered at p.s.bameetha, district chhatarpur, for the offences punishable under section 498-a of the ipc and 3/4 of the dowry prohibition act. learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. he is a government employee/teacher. the examinations are going on. it is a matrimonial matter, in the event of arrest, the chances of compromise between the parties, if any, will be diminished, therefore, applicant be released on ad-interim anticipatory bail. learned counsel for state and the objector have opposed the application. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to grant ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, i.a.no.7178/2013 is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.25,000/-(rs.twenty five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. the applicant is directed to join the investigation and fully co-operate with the investigating agency. he shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub- section (2) of section 438 of cr.p.c.this order shall remain in force till disposal of the main application under section 438 of cr.p.c.list for final hearing in the week commencing 22.4.2013 certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.3912/2013 2.4.2013 Shri Neeraj Nahar, Advocate for the applicant.

Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State.

Shri R.K.Khare, Advocate for the objector.

Admit.

Call for the case diary.

Heard on I.A.No.7178/2013, an application for grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant.

The applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.40/2013 registered at P.S.Bameetha, District Chhatarpur, for the offences punishable under Section 498-A of the IPC and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the case.

He is a government employee/teacher.

The examinations are going on.

It is a matrimonial matter, in the event of arrest, the chances of compromise between the parties, if any, will be diminished, therefore, applicant be released on ad-interim anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel for State and the objector have opposed the application.

On due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the considered view that it is a fit case to grant ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, I.A.No.7178/2013 is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rs.Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer.

The applicant is directed to join the investigation and fully co-operate with the investigating agency.

He shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in sub- section (2) of Section 438 of Cr.P.C.This order shall remain in force till disposal of the main application under section 438 of Cr.P.C.List for final hearing in the week commencing 22.4.2013 Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge PB

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial