Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dhan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Dhan Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 02, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047529

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhan Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 mcrc. no.2608 /2013 2.4.2013 shri r.s.tiwari, adv.for the petitioner/applicant. shripuneet shroti, p.l.for state. heard . learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in jail since more than one year and up till not fourteen witnesses have been examined in the case and they have not deposed against the applicant . there is no prima facie case is made out against the applicant . looking to the facts and circumstances of the case it deserves to call for the progress report of the trial of st no.62/12 (state v. dharm singh and another) pending before firs.addition sessions judge narsinghpur mp within a period of fortnight. list on 25.4.2013. (m.a.siddiqui ) judge ag/ 1

Full Judgment

1 MCRC.

No.2608 /2013 2.4.2013 Shri R.S.Tiwari, Adv.for the petitioner/applicant.

ShriPuneet Shroti, P.L.for state.

Heard .

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in jail since more than one year and up till not fourteen witnesses have been examined in the case and they have not deposed against the applicant .

There is no prima facie case is made out against the applicant .

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case it deserves to call for the progress report of the trial of ST No.62/12 (State v.

Dharm Singh and another) pending before FiRs.Addition Sessions Judge Narsinghpur MP within a period of fortnight.

List on 25.4.2013.

(M.A.Siddiqui ) JUDGE Ag/ 1

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial