Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

ies School of Pharmacy Vs. All India Council for Technical Education

ies School of Pharmacy vs All India Council for Technical Education

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Dec 05, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047462

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ies School of Pharmacy

Respondent

All India Council for Technical Education

Excerpt

w.p.no.15320/2012(o) 05.12.2012 shri siddharth gupta, advocate for the petitioner. shri pradeep sharma, advocate for respondents. the petitioner sought following reliefs:- "(i) this hon'ble court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondent aicte for issuing a formal order/communication relating to closure of their 60 seats of b. pharmacy course, constituting the subject matter of present petition within a time bound period. (ii) any other order or direction deemed just and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case may also be passed with costs."the case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has moved an application for closure of its pharmacy college by filing an application to the respondents but the aforesaid application has not been decided till date by issuing the formal letter of closure, though on the website, the petitioner's institution has been shown as closed with zero intake. it is submitted that the respondents may be directed to decide the application so that the petitioner may get refund of its security etc from the respondents. shri sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that if any application is pending with the respondents, it shall be decided and in case the petitioner's application has already been decided, then the decision on the application shall be communicated to the petitioner and for this purpose, he prays three weeks time. prayer is allowed. this petition is finally disposed of in terms of statement made by the respondents. c.c.as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt. vimla jain) judge judge psm

Full Judgment

W.P.No.15320/2012(O) 05.12.2012 Shri Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Pradeep Sharma, Advocate for respondents.

The petitioner sought following reliefs:- "(i) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondent AICTE for issuing a formal order/communication relating to closure of their 60 seats of B.

Pharmacy course, constituting the subject matter of present petition within a time bound period.

(ii) Any other order or direction deemed just and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case may also be passed with costs."

The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has moved an application for closure of its Pharmacy College by filing an application to the respondents but the aforesaid application has not been decided till date by issuing the formal letter of closure, though on the website, the petitioner's institution has been shown as closed with zero intake.

It is submitted that the respondents may be directed to decide the application so that the petitioner may get refund of its security etc from the respondents.

Shri Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has submitted that if any application is pending with the respondents, it shall be decided and in case the petitioner's application has already been decided, then the decision on the application shall be communicated to the petitioner and for this purpose, he prays three weeks time.

Prayer is allowed.

This petition is finally disposed of in terms of statement made by the respondents.

C.C.as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.

Vimla Jain) Judge Judge psm

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial