Full Judgment
Deval singh versus state W.P.No.20309/2012 5.12.2012: Shri Arun K.
Dwivedi, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri B.P.Pandey, learned Dy.Govt.
Adv.for the respondents.
Heard.
In this writ petition, the petitioner inter alia seeks a direction to the respondents to declare the petitioner qualified in the test which was held for appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade III.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner holds D.Ed Degree and therefore, he is entitled to 20 marks under the rules namely Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Samvida Shala Shikshak (Employment and Conditions of Contract) Rules, 2005.
However, the petitioner is not awarded 20 marks.
It is further submitted the petitioner be granted liberty to submit a representation to the competent authority with regard to his grievance and the writ petition be disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the representation which may be submitted by the petitioner.
On the other hand, learned Government Advocate fairly submitted that in case the petitioner submits a representation, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law.
In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and in the facts of the case, the writ petition is Deval singh versus state disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to consider and decide the representation which may be submitted by the petitioner within a period of three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of the order passed today.
Needless to state that the competent authority while deciding the representation of the petitioner shall pass a speaking order.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
With the aforesaid, this petition stands disposed of.
c.c.as per rules.
(Rajendra Menon) Judge mrs.mishra