Full Judgment
1 W.P.No.20313/2012 Sushma Uikey versus State of M.P.& ORS.05.12.2012 Heard Shri Sushil Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the present petition seeking a direction to the Collector, Mandla to decide the representation filed by him on 27.9.2012 praying for implementation of the order passed by the Collector himself on 28.8.2012.
Shri S.M.Lal, the learned Govt.
Advocate, submits that the representation filed by the petitioner shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.
In view of the aforesaid, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files a copy of the order passed today alongwith a copy of the petition before the Collector, Mandla within fifteen days, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of three months thereafter.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and therefore the authority would be at liberty to examine the matter keeping all facts and facets into 2 W.P.No.20313/2012 Sushma Uikey versus State of M.P.& ORS.consideration and thereafter either accept or reject the representation by passing a reasoned order.
With the aforesaid direction, the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.
C.C as per rules.
( R.S.JHA ) JUDGE mms/-