Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Udde Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Udde Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 25, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047284

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Udde Singh

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.2735/2013 25.02.2013 shri ajit narayan, petitioner in person. heard on the question of admission and interim relief. issue notice of this writ petition to the respondents on payment of p.f.within 7 days by registered a.d.notices be made returnable in six weeks. it is contended by the petitioner that the recommendations made by the ugc have been duly accepted by the central government and a circular has been issued prescribing the age of superannuation of the registrar and other employees of the institution. in complete violation of the notification issued by the central government, by the impugned letter, it is communicated that the age of superannuation of the persons like petitioner would be 60 years.it is contended that this circular is coming in way of the petitioner in performing the duties. looking to the aforesaid and keeping in view the memorandum issued by respondent no.1, the operation of circular dated 14.11.2012 (annexure p-3).is hereby stayed till the next date of consideration. list the petition on 30th april, 2013 for consideration. certified copy as per rules. (k.k.trivedi) judge b b

Full Judgment

W.P.No.2735/2013 25.02.2013 Shri Ajit Narayan, Petitioner in person.

Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.

Issue notice of this writ petition to the respondents on payment of P.F.within 7 days by registered A.D.Notices be made returnable in six weeks.

It is contended by the petitioner that the recommendations made by the UGC have been duly accepted by the Central Government and a circular has been issued prescribing the age of superannuation of the Registrar and other employees of the Institution.

In complete violation of the notification issued by the Central Government, by the impugned letter, it is communicated that the age of superannuation of the persons like petitioner would be 60 yeaRs.It is contended that this circular is coming in way of the petitioner in performing the duties.

Looking to the aforesaid and keeping in view the memorandum issued by respondent No.1, the operation of circular dated 14.11.2012 (Annexure P-3).is hereby stayed till the next date of consideration.

List the petition on 30th April, 2013 for consideration.

Certified copy as per rules.

(K.K.Trivedi) Judge b b

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial