Dev Narayan Pathak Vs. Indrajeet Shankar Dani

Dev Narayan Pathak vs indrajeet Shankar Dani

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Feb 25, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047280

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1047280
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Feb 25, 2013
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dev Narayan Pathak

Advocate Shri. Gopal Singh, Shri. A.K.Jain

Respondent

indrajeet Shankar Dani

Excerpt

con.c.no.328/13 25/02/13 shri gopal singh, learned counsel for the petitioners.as contempt application with regard to implementation of the order is already pending at the instance of the main petitioner in w.p.no.10000/10 namely home guard sainik evam parivar kalyan sangh and others versus state of m.p.and another , i am not inclined to initiate action for contempt at the instance of the new employee. the contempt application shall be made applicable in the case of the present applicants also. with the aforesaid, finding no case made out for initiating action for contempt, this application is disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge vy/- con.c.no.368/13 27/02/13 shri a.k.jain, learned counsel for the petitioners.as contempt application with regard to implementation of the order is already pending at the instance of the main petitioner in w.p.no.10000/10 namely home guard sainik evam parivar kalyan sangh and others versus state of m.p.and another , i am not inclined to initiate action for contempt at the instance of the new employee. the contempt application shall be made applicable in the case of the present applicants also. with the aforesaid, finding no case made out for initiating action for contempt, this application is disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge vy/-

Full Judgment

Con.C.No.328/13 25/02/13 Shri Gopal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.As contempt application with regard to implementation of the order is already pending at the instance of the main petitioner in W.P.No.10000/10 namely Home Guard Sainik Evam Parivar Kalyan Sangh and others versus State of M.P.and another , I am not inclined to initiate action for contempt at the instance of the new employee.

The contempt application shall be made applicable in the case of the present applicants also.

With the aforesaid, finding no case made out for initiating action for contempt, this application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge Vy/- Con.C.No.368/13 27/02/13 Shri A.K.Jain, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.As contempt application with regard to implementation of the order is already pending at the instance of the main petitioner in W.P.No.10000/10 namely Home Guard Sainik Evam Parivar Kalyan Sangh and others versus State of M.P.and another , I am not inclined to initiate action for contempt at the instance of the new employee.