Mohd. Aslam Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Mohd. Aslam vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 26, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047194

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1047194
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Mar 26, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mohd. Aslam

Advocate Shri. Manish Tiwari

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

criminal revision no.1928/2011 26.3.2013 shri manish tiwari, counsel for the applicant. shri prakash gupta, panel lawyer for the state/respondent. with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that the trial court in compliance to the judgment dated 21.9.2011 passed by the learned sessions judge, chhindwara in criminal appeal no.118/2011, shall hear the learned counsel for the parties finally and shall specifically decide all counts charges, according to the law and if the accused is found guilty for each charge then, it would be specified that the sentence passed for each count shall run concurrently or not. by the judgment dated 21.9.2011, the learned sessions judge did not direct for retrial and after pronouncement of the judgment by the trial court, the applicant has his right to raise all such objections before the appellate court. with the aforesaid directions, the present revision application is hereby disposed off. a copy of the order be sent to the trial court as well as to the appellate court for information and compliance. the interim stay order passed by this court is hereby vacated. certified copy, as per rules. (n.k.gupta) judge pushpendra

Full Judgment

Criminal Revision No.1928/2011 26.3.2013 Shri Manish Tiwari, counsel for the applicant.

Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent.

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that the trial Court in compliance to the judgment dated 21.9.2011 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Chhindwara in criminal appeal No.118/2011, shall hear the learned counsel for the parties finally and shall specifically decide all counts charges, according to the law and if the accused is found guilty for each charge then, it would be specified that the sentence passed for each count shall run concurrently or not.

By the judgment dated 21.9.2011, the learned Sessions Judge did not direct for retrial and after pronouncement of the judgment by the trial Court, the applicant has his right to raise all such objections before the appellate Court.

With the aforesaid directions, the present revision application is hereby disposed off.

A copy of the order be sent to the trial Court as well as to the appellate Court for information and compliance.

The interim stay order passed by this Court is hereby vacated.

Certified copy, as per rules.

(N.K.GUPTA) JUDGE Pushpendra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Mohd. Aslam vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education