Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rasool Shah Vs. Chancellor

Rasool Shah vs Chancellor

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 05, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047120

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rasool Shah

Advocate Shri. Arvind Shrivastava

Respondent

Chancellor

Advocate Shri. P.N.Dubey

Excerpt

high court of madhya pradesh : at jabalpur writ petition no.16825/2007(s) rasool shah versus chancellor, jnkvv and others present: hon’ble shri justice rajendra menon. shri arvind shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri p.n.dubey, learned counsel for the respondents. whether approved for reporting: yes/ no order 05.11.2012 for the reasons stated in the common order passed today in writ petition no.16824/2007 [pramod tiwari versus chancellor, jnkvv and others]., the petitions is also allowed. impugned order- dated 5.8.2003 - annexure p/3 dismissing the petitioner from service and the consequential orders dismissing the appeal and revision are all quashed. respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service and grant him all consequential benefits. however, if so advised, respondents are free to proceed in the matter for taking action against the petitioner for the alleged misconduct by conducting a proper departmental inquiry. 2- accordingly, the petition stands allowed and disposed of. 3- copy of the order passed in writ petition no.16824/2007 be retained in this filed. ( rajendra meno.) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No.16825/2007(S) Rasool Shah versus Chancellor, JNKVV and others Present: Hon’ble Shri Justice Rajendra Menon.

Shri Arvind Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri P.N.Dubey, learned counsel for the respondents.

Whether approved for reporting: Yes/ No ORDER

05.11.2012 For the reasons stated in the common order passed today in Writ Petition No.16824/2007 [Pramod Tiwari versus Chancellor, JNKVV and others]., the petitions is also allowed.

Impugned order- dated 5.8.2003 - Annexure P/3 dismissing the petitioner from service and the consequential orders dismissing the appeal and revision are all quashed.

Respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service and grant him all consequential benefits.

However, if so advised, respondents are free to proceed in the matter for taking action against the petitioner for the alleged misconduct by conducting a proper departmental inquiry.

2- Accordingly, the petition stands allowed and disposed of.

3- Copy of the order passed in Writ Petition No.16824/2007 be retained in this filed.

( RAJENDRA MENo.) JUDGE Aks/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial