Ashok Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Ashok Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 09, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046996

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046996
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Nov 09, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ashok Kumar

Advocate Shri. Anirudh Pandey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.19253/2012 09/11/2012 shri anirudh pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri b.p.tiwari, learned p.l. for the respondents/state. petitioner claims grant of compassionate appointment. petitioner's mother was working in the respondent's department and has died in harness on 12.10.2010. it is stated that the claim of the petitioner is not considered and the same is still pending. in view of the aforesaid, respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment in accordance with policies and circulars applicable and decide the same by a speaking order within a period of four months. with the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge nd

Full Judgment

W.P.No.19253/2012 09/11/2012 Shri Anirudh Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri B.P.Tiwari, learned P.L. for the respondents/State.

Petitioner claims grant of compassionate appointment. Petitioner's mother was working in the respondent's department and has died in harness on 12.10.2010.

It is stated that the claim of the petitioner is not considered and the same is still pending.

In view of the aforesaid, respondents are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment in accordance with policies and circulars applicable and decide the same by a speaking order within a period of four months.

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

Certified Copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge nd

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Ashok Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education