Munnalal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Munnalal vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 09, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046980

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046980
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Nov 09, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Munnalal

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

munnalal versus state of madhya pradesh and six others.09.11.2012. shri v.p.singh for the petitioner. shri s.s.bisen, government advocate, for the state on advance notice. petitioner has been suspended. allegation against the petitioner was that he and certain other persons - respondent nos.4 to 7, were found gambling in the office premises and, therefore, pending departmental action they have been suspended. grievance of the petitioner is that in the case of respondent nos.4 to 7 the suspension order has been revoked, but in his case the benefit is not extended. keeping in view the aforesaid, on the petitioner’s filing a certified copy of this order alongwith the details with regard to the claim before the competent appellate authority authorized to hear the appeal under rule 9 of the mp civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules, the appellate authority shall decide the appeal by a speaking order within a period of 30 days from the date of its receipt. while deciding the same, the benefit of revocation of suspension granted to respondent nos.4 to 7 shall be taken note of, considered and a decision taken by passing a speaking order, indicating application of mind. with the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge aks/-

Full Judgment

Munnalal versus State of Madhya Pradesh and six otheRs.09.11.2012.

Shri V.P.Singh for the petitioner.

Shri S.S.Bisen, Government Advocate, for the State on advance notice.

Petitioner has been suspended.

Allegation against the petitioner was that he and certain other persons - respondent Nos.4 to 7, were found gambling in the office premises and, therefore, pending departmental action they have been suspended.

Grievance of the petitioner is that in the case of respondent Nos.4 to 7 the suspension order has been revoked, but in his case the benefit is not extended.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, on the petitioner’s filing a certified copy of this order alongwith the details with regard to the claim before the competent appellate authority authorized to hear the appeal under Rule 9 of the MP Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, the appellate authority shall decide the appeal by a speaking order within a period of 30 days from the date of its receipt.

While deciding the same, the benefit of revocation of suspension granted to respondent Nos.4 to 7 shall be taken note of, considered and a decision taken by passing a speaking order, indicating application of mind.

With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(RAJENDRA MENON) JUDGE Aks/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Munnalal vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition