Kallu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Kallu vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 09, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046971

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046971
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Nov 09, 2012
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kallu

Advocate Shri. Neeraj Nahar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

.....and considered or the same is still pending for adjudication on which, he submits that their representation annexure-p-5 is still pending for consideration before the authorities. he further prayed at this stage this petition be disposed of with appropriate direction to the authorities of the respondents to consider and decide their pending representation annexure-p-5 keeping in view the policy promulgated by the state of m.p.in this regard on some early date with some time bound schedule. in view of the aforesaid, instead to admit or issuing any notice of this petition, the same is hereby disposed of with a direction to the authorities of the respondents to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners annexure-p-5, keeping in view the concerned policy promulgated by this state of m.p.in this regard by speaking order within 60 days from the date of submitting the certified copy of this order along with the copy of this petition with annexures on behalf of the petitioner in their office. it is further observed that on such consideration, if the petitioners are found fit for extending any benefit either in the shape of compensation and/or in the shape of employment to any family member of each petitioners.then the same be extended to them. petition is disposed of as indicated above. certified copy as per rules. (u.c.maheshwari) judge pb

Full Judgment

Writ Petition No.18652/12.

9.11.2012 Shri Neeraj Nahar, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.He is heard on the question of admission.

The petitioners without challenging any specific order, have filed this petition for issuing the appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the authorities of the respondents to determine the compensation at the market rate with respect of the land which is being acquisitioned by such authorities regarding some project of respondent no.5.

In addition to it, the prayer for directing the respondent no.2 to give the service to one family member of the petitioners’ in accordance with the policy of the State Govt, is also made.

Initially the case was argued at length for admission and allowing this petition but on asking the petitioners’ counsel whether their representation Annexure-P-5 has been adjudicated and considered or the same is still pending for adjudication on which, he submits that their representation Annexure-P-5 is still pending for consideration before the authorities.

He further prayed at this stage this petition be disposed of with appropriate direction to the authorities of the respondents to consider and decide their pending representation Annexure-P-5 keeping in view the policy promulgated by the State of M.P.in this regard on some early date with some time bound schedule.

In view of the aforesaid, instead to admit or issuing any notice of this petition, the same is hereby disposed of with a direction to the authorities of the respondents to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners Annexure-P-5, keeping in view the concerned policy promulgated by this State of M.P.in this regard by speaking order within 60 days from the date of submitting the certified copy of this order along with the copy of this petition with annexures on behalf of the petitioner in their Office.

It is further observed that on such consideration, if the petitioners are found fit for extending any benefit either in the shape of compensation and/or in the shape of employment to any family member of each petitioneRs.then the same be extended to them.

Petition is disposed of as indicated above.

Certified copy as per rules.

(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge Pb

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Kallu vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Land Acquisition