Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lenhard Vs. Wolff

Lenhard vs Wolff

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1979
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/104696

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
444 U.S. 1301
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lenhard

Respondent

Wolff

Excerpt

lenhard v. wolff - 444 u.s. 1301 (1979) u.s. supreme court lenhard v. wolff , 444 u.s. 1301 (1979) 444 u.s. 1301 kirk b. lenhard and george e. franzen, clark county deputy public defenders, individually and as next friends acting on behalf of jesse walter bishop, applicants, v. charles wolff, warden, nevada state prison system, et al no. a-172 no.a-332 supreme court of the united states october 18, 1979 mr. justice rehnquist. on lenhard v. wolff, 444 u.s. 807 . respondents have subsequently rescheduled bishop's execution for monday, october 22, 1979. lenhard and franzen have now submitted to me, as circuit justice, a petition requesting rehearing of this court's order of october 1, and an application for stay of execution pending determination of the petition for rehearing. resolving in applicants' favor all questions pertaining to procedures and rules of the court, i am satisfied that the moving papers would not persuade the requisite number of justices to grant applicants' proposed petition for certiorari, to page 444 u.s. 1301 , 1302 grant the petition for rehearing of this court's previous denial of a stay pending the filing of a petition for certiorari, or to grant a stay pending conference consideration of the petition for rehearing. see this court's rule 58. as a consequence whether the submission presented to me as circuit justice on october 16, 1979, is treated as a request for a rehearing of our previous denial of a stay of execution, or as a new request for a stay of execution, it is in all respects denied.

Full Judgment

LENHARD v. WOLFF - 444 U.S. 1301 (1979)
U.S. Supreme Court LENHARD v. WOLFF , 444 U.S. 1301 (1979)

444 U.S. 1301

Kirk B. LENHARD and George E. Franzen, Clark County Deputy Public Defenders, individually and as next friends acting on behalf of Jesse Walter Bishop, applicants,
v.
Charles WOLFF, Warden, Nevada State Prison System, et al
No. A-172
No.A-332

Supreme Court of the United States

October 18, 1979

Mr. Justice REHNQUIST.

On Lenhard v. Wolff, 444 U.S. 807 . Respondents have subsequently rescheduled Bishop's execution for Monday, October 22, 1979. Lenhard and Franzen have now submitted to me, as Circuit Justice, a petition requesting rehearing of this Court's order of October 1, and an application for stay of execution pending determination of the petition for rehearing.

Resolving in applicants' favor all questions pertaining to procedures and rules of the Court, I am satisfied that the moving papers would not persuade the requisite number of Justices to grant applicants' proposed petition for certiorari, to

Page 444 U.S. 1301 , 1302

grant the petition for rehearing of this Court's previous denial of a stay pending the filing of a petition for certiorari, or to grant a stay pending Conference consideration of the petition for rehearing. See this Court's Rule 58. As a consequence whether the submission presented to me as Circuit Justice on October 16, 1979, is treated as a request for a rehearing of our previous denial of a stay of execution, or as a new request for a stay of execution, it is in all respects

Denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial