Dileep Kumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Dileep Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 09, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046953

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046953
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Nov 09, 2012
Subject: Banking

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Banking

Key legal issue: Banking

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dileep Kumar

Advocate Shri. Sandeep Mishra

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

dileep kumar sahu versus state of m.p.& ors.writ petition no.18830 ”9. 11.2012: shri sandeep mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri sanjeev kumar singh, learned panel for respondents/state. matter pertains to appointment of gram rojgar sahayak. it has been consistently held by this court in various cases that the appointment of gram rojgar sahayak is subject to statutory appeal and revision under the m.p.panchayat evam gram swaraj adhiniyma, 1993 and, therefore, a petition directly before this court without taking recours.of statutory remedy available is not permissible. accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recours.of statutory remedy of appeal available this petition is disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-

Full Judgment

Dileep Kumar Sahu versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.18830 ”

9. 11.2012: Shri Sandeep Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Sanjeev Kumar Singh, learned Panel for respondents/State.

Matter pertains to appointment of Gram Rojgar Sahayak.

It has been consistently held by this Court in various cases that the appointment of Gram Rojgar Sahayak is subject to statutory appeal and revision under the M.P.Panchayat Evam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyma, 1993 and, therefore, a petition directly before this Court without taking recouRs.of statutory remedy available is not permissible.

Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.of statutory remedy of appeal available this petition is disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Dileep Kumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Banking