Prembai Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Prembai vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 25, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046868

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046868
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 25, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prembai

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 1 writ appeal no.369/2011 25.07.2012 shri a.k.jain, advocate, for the appellant. shri vijay pandey, deputy advocate general for the re- spondents. learned counsel for the respondents is directed to specify :- i) whether the appellant who was earlier appointed as ‘anganwadi worker’ was entitled to be appointed in the year 2000 under sub clause (6) of clause 1 of the circular dated 6.1.2000?. ii) whether for the appointment, any applications were invited and no other candidate except the appellant was available for appointment on the post of andan- wadi worker?. the relevant record of the appointment of the appellant be also produced by the respondents by the next date of hearing. be listed for hearing in the last week of august, 2012. a typed copy of this order be supplied to shri vijay pandey, deputy advocate general. (krishn kumar lahoti) (smt.vimla jain) judge judge hs

Full Judgment

1 1 Writ Appeal No.369/2011 25.07.2012 Shri A.K.Jain, Advocate, for the appellant.

Shri Vijay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General for the re- spondents.

Learned counsel for the respondents is directed to specify :- i) whether the appellant who was earlier appointed as ‘Anganwadi Worker’ was entitled to be appointed in the year 2000 under sub clause (6) of clause 1 of the circular dated 6.1.2000?.

ii) Whether for the appointment, any applications were invited and no other candidate except the appellant was available for appointment on the post of Andan- wadi worker?.

The relevant record of the appointment of the appellant be also produced by the respondents by the next date of hearing.

Be listed for hearing in the last week of August, 2012.

A typed copy of this order be supplied to Shri Vijay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) Judge Judge HS

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Prembai vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education