Full Judgment
W.P.No.11529 / 2013 (Puneet ..Vs..State of MP & otheRs.19-07-2013 Shri Tabrez Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri S.M.Lal, learned panel lawyer for the State/respondents.
Heard on the question of admission.
The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the petitioner's application seeking appointment as Safai Kaamgar in Nagar Palika Parishad, ItaRs.is not being processed.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is entitled to appointment on account of the fact that his mother had been working as Safai Kaamgar and has thereafter superannuated from the said post and, therefore, in view of the provisions of Rules 8-A and 11-A of the M.P.Municipalities Officers and Servers (Appointment and Condition of Service) Rules, 2000, the petitioner is also entitled to be considered.
From a perusal of the petition it is clear that the matter is pending before the authority.
In the circumstances, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction that in case the petitioner furnishes a copy of the order passed today and a copy of the petition to the competent authority within 15 days of obtaining the same, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the matter pending before him in accordance with law expeditiously.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner and, therefore, the concerned authority, while deciding the representation of the petitioner, would be at liberty to take into consideration all facts and facets of the case and thereafter take a decision thereon by either accepting or rejecting the same.
With the aforesaid directions the petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.
C.C.as per rules.
(R.S.Jha) mct Judge