Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arjun Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Arjun Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 19, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046822

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arjun Singh

Advocate Shri. Ghanshyam Pandey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m. cr.c.no.7756/13 19/07/13 shri ghanshyam pandey, learned counsel for the applicant. shri sanjay dwivedi, learned govt. adv.for the state. applicant arjun singh has been arrested in crime no.114/08 for offences u/s 307 and 302/34 of i.p.c. the bail applications have been rejected on merit by this court. however, on the ground that he is suffering from epilepsy and wanted to undergo treatment, bail on medical ground was sought for. this was permitted by this court and it is seen that since 23/01/12 after orders were passed in m. cr.c.no.13865/11, the applicant had been on bail on various occasions. the bail to him has been extended from time to time. now, from a period of one year, he is on bail on medical ground and extension of bail is sought for on medical ground on the ground that applicant is undergoing treatment in apollo hospital, new delhi and, therefore, the temporary bail granted be extended. i have gone through the medical evidence and documents available on record and it is seen that applicant is only suffering from certain epileptic attack and there is nothing available on record to show that he is suffering from such a serious ailment which warrants his continuous treatment or remaining in the hospital. the applicant is alleged to have committed a serious offence. he is charged under section 302 of i.p.c. and on merit, the bail applications are rejected. the medical evidence available on record does not warrant any temporary bail to the applicant. accordingly, finding no case made out for granting any further bail to the applicant, the application is dismissed. (rajendra menon) judge vy/-

Full Judgment

M.

Cr.C.No.7756/13 19/07/13 Shri Ghanshyam Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant.

Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned Govt.

Adv.for the State.

Applicant Arjun Singh has been arrested in Crime No.114/08 for offences U/s 307 and 302/34 of I.P.C.

The bail applications have been rejected on merit by this Court.

However, on the ground that he is suffering from epilepsy and wanted to undergo treatment, bail on medical ground was sought for.

This was permitted by this Court and it is seen that since 23/01/12 after orders were passed in M.

Cr.C.No.13865/11, the applicant had been on bail on various occasions.

The bail to him has been extended from time to time.

Now, from a period of one year, he is on bail on medical ground and extension of bail is sought for on medical ground on the ground that applicant is undergoing treatment in Apollo Hospital, New Delhi and, therefore, the temporary bail granted be extended.

I have gone through the medical evidence and documents available on record and it is seen that applicant is only suffering from certain epileptic attack and there is nothing available on record to show that he is suffering from such a serious ailment which warrants his continuous treatment or remaining in the hospital.

The applicant is alleged to have committed a serious offence.

He is charged under Section 302 of I.P.C.

and on merit, the bail applications are rejected.

The medical evidence available on record does not warrant any temporary bail to the applicant.

Accordingly, finding no case made out for granting any further bail to the applicant, the application is dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge Vy/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial