Suyash Packaging Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Suyash Packaging vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 17, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046586

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046586
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 17, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suyash Packaging

Advocate Shri. Abhishek Oswal, Shri. Purohit

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

---1--- w.p.no.8566/2013 17.5.2013 shri g.n.purohit learned counsel with shri abhishek oswal, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri sanjay dwivedi, learned dy. government advocate for respondents. it is submitted by shri purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner and identical matter w.p.no.13173/2011 has been entertained by this court and the controvers.involved in this case is also identical, therefore, he prays for analogous hearing of both the cases. it is also submitted by him that interim protection be also be granted to the petitioner. shri sanjay dwivedi, learned dy. government advocate opposed the aforesaid contention on the ground that an alternative remedy of filing the appeal is provided. but at present considering the fact that identical matter has been entertained and has been fixed for hearing, we entertain this petition and fixed this case for analogous hearing alongwith w.p.no.13173/2011 on 8.7.2013. office to list both these cases on the aforesaid date. in the meantime respondents may file reply on merits of the case. till next date of hearing it is directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner for recovery of outstanding demand of the commercial tax as demanded vide order dated 26.11.2012 and affirmed by order 11.2.2013 in case not vakar/upa/sa-i/2013/447. c.c.as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) (m.a.siddiqui) acting chief justice judge ak

Full Judgment

---1--- W.P.No.8566/2013 17.5.2013 Shri G.N.Purohit learned counsel with Shri Abhishek Oswal, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned Dy.

Government Advocate for respondents.

It is submitted by Shri Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner and identical matter W.P.No.13173/2011 has been entertained by this Court and the controveRs.involved in this case is also identical, therefore, he prays for analogous hearing of both the cases.

It is also submitted by him that interim protection be also be granted to the petitioner.

Shri Sanjay Dwivedi, learned Dy.

Government Advocate opposed the aforesaid contention on the ground that an alternative remedy of filing the appeal is provided.

But at present considering the fact that identical matter has been entertained and has been fixed for hearing, we entertain this petition and fixed this case for analogous hearing alongwith W.P.No.13173/2011 on 8.7.2013.

Office to list both these cases on the aforesaid date.

In the meantime respondents may file reply on merits of the case.

Till next date of hearing it is directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner for recovery of outstanding demand of the commercial tax as demanded vide order dated 26.11.2012 and affirmed by order 11.2.2013 in case not Vakar/Upa/SA-I/2013/447.

C.C.as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (M.A.Siddiqui) Acting Chief Justice Judge AK

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Suyash Packaging vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education