Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Narayan Das Vs. Madan Kumar

Narayan Das vs Madan Kumar

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 12, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046465

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narayan Das

Respondent

Madan Kumar

Excerpt

1 m.c.c.no.305/2013 narayan das madan kumar & other 12.4.2013 this application is filed for extension of time for the compliance of the order dated 5.5.2011 by which an application bearing mcc no.390/2010 for restoration of m.a.no.4420/2007 was allowed by an order which reads thus:- “none for petitioner. this application has been filed for restoration of m.a.no.4420/2007, which was dismissed because of non-compliance of peremptory order. for the reasons stated in the application, supported by an affidavit, a case is made out for restoration of the case and accordingly this application is allowed on following terms:- 1. petitioner to deposit rs.300/- (rupees three hundred only) in the high court legal services authority for the aid of the poor within a period of thirty days from today and to file receipt in the office.”2. petitioner to comply with peremptory order within a period of thirty days from today.”3. on compliance of aforesaid both the conditions, office to restore m.a.no.4420/2007 to its number and to place it before the appropriate bench for consideration.” the present application has been filed for extension of time to deposit the cost which was imposed on the petitioner. considering peculiar facts of the case, in the interest of justice, this application is allowed. the time period for deposit of cost is extended for a further period of 30 days from today. with the aforesaid direction, this mcc is finally disposed of. c.c.as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) acting chief justice c.

Full Judgment

1 M.C.C.No.305/2013 Narayan Das Madan Kumar & other 12.4.2013 This application is filed for extension of time for the compliance of the order dated 5.5.2011 by which an application bearing MCC No.390/2010 for restoration of M.A.No.4420/2007 was allowed by an order which reads thus:- “None for petitioner.

This application has been filed for restoration of M.A.No.4420/2007, which was dismissed because of non-compliance of peremptory order.

For the reasons stated in the application, supported by an affidavit, a case is made out for restoration of the case and accordingly this application is allowed on following terms:- 1.

Petitioner to deposit Rs.300/- (Rupees three hundred only) in the High Court Legal Services Authority for the aid of the poor within a period of thirty days from today and to file receipt in the office.”

2. Petitioner to comply with peremptory order within a period of thirty days from today.”

3. On compliance of aforesaid both the conditions, office to restore M.A.No.4420/2007 to its number and to place it before the appropriate Bench for consideration.”

The present application has been filed for extension of time to deposit the cost which was imposed on the petitioner.

Considering peculiar facts of the case, in the interest of justice, this application is allowed.

The time period for deposit of cost is extended for a further period of 30 days from today.

With the aforesaid direction, this MCC is finally disposed of.

C.C.as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) Acting Chief Justice C.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial