Manranjan Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Manranjan Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 27, 2012

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046374

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046374
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 27, 2012
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manranjan Singh

Advocate Shri. S.K.Mishra

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 w.p.no.10416/2012 27/7/2012: shri s.k.mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri swapnil ganguly, learned panel lawyer for the respondents. learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that the controvers.involved in the instant petition is squarely covered by the order dated 26.9.2011 passed by this court in w.p.no.15760/2011 (s).in view of the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners on the basis of the stipulation contained in rule 6(5) of the m.p.panchayat samvida shala shikshak (employment and conditions of contract) rules 2005 as was in force before the amendment and to take a decision with regard to appointment of samvida shala shikshak grade iii and to communicate the decision to the petitioners within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. the writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated hereinabove without any order as to costs. c.c.as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge mrs.mishra

Full Judgment

1 W.P.No.10416/2012 27/7/2012: Shri S.K.Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Swapnil Ganguly, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondents.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that the controveRs.involved in the instant petition is squarely covered by the order dated 26.9.2011 passed by this Court in W.P.No.15760/2011 (s).In view of the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners on the basis of the stipulation contained in Rule 6(5) of the M.P.Panchayat Samvida Shala Shikshak (Employment and Conditions of Contract) Rules 2005 as was in force before the amendment and to take a decision with regard to appointment of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade III and to communicate the decision to the petitioners within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated hereinabove without any order as to costs.

c.c.as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge Mrs.mishra

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2012 Same Parties Manranjan Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education