Netram Vs. Collector of District

Netram vs Collector of District

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Mar 20, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046234

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046234
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Mar 20, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Netram

Advocate Shri. P.N. Das

Respondent

Collector of District

Excerpt

1 w.p. no. 3555 of 2013 20.3.2013 shri p.n. das, learned counsel for the petitioner. smt. sheetal dubey, learned government advocate for respondent state, on advance notice. heard. petitioner, a kotwar of village lurehta, tahsil and district narsinghpur claiming the ancestral right over the immovable property bearing khasra nos. 2, 87 and 154 said to have been allotted to the ancestors of the petitioner by malguzar prior to coming into force abolition of proprietary rights (estates, mahals and alienated lands) act, 1950, seeks direction to the respondents to consider his claim for bhumiswami right as per the decision taken vide circular no. f26/07/ lkr,d dated 3.3.2010 as also a decision taken by chhattisgarh high court in the case of tikaram and others v. state of m.p. and another w.p. no. 2064/2000 decided on 3.5.2001. learned government advocate appearing for respondents does no. dispute the issuance of circular dated 3.3.2010; whereby, collectors in the state of m.p. have been directed to decide the cases of kotwars qua the land granted to them by ex malguzars.in view whereof the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner which he shall file within a period of 15 days from the communication of this order and take a decision within a period 2 of 3 months from the date of receiving such representation and communicate the same to the petitioner. the writ petition is disposed of finally in above terms.c.c. as per rules. (sanjay yadav) judge vivek tripathi

Full Judgment

1 W.P. No. 3555 Of 2013 20.3.2013 Shri P.N. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Smt.

Sheetal Dubey, learned Government Advocate for respondent State, on advance notice.

Heard.

Petitioner, a Kotwar of village Lurehta, tahsil and district Narsinghpur claiming the ancestral right over the immovable property bearing Khasra Nos. 2, 87 and 154 said to have been allotted to the ancestors of the petitioner by Malguzar prior to coming into force Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals and Alienated Lands) Act, 1950, seeks direction to the respondents to consider his claim for Bhumiswami right as per the decision taken vide circular No. F26/07/ lkr,d dated 3.3.2010 as also a decision taken by Chhattisgarh High Court in the case of Tikaram and others v. State of M.P. and another W.P. No. 2064/2000 decided on 3.5.2001.

Learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents does No. dispute the issuance of circular dated 3.3.2010; whereby, Collectors in the State of M.P. have been directed to decide the cases of Kotwars qua the land granted to them by ex MalguzaRs.In view whereof the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner which he shall file within a period of 15 days from the communication of this order and take a decision within a period 2 of 3 months from the date of receiving such representation and communicate the same to the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of finally in above terMs.C.c. as per rules.

(SANJAY YADAV) JUDGE Vivek Tripathi

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Netram vs Collector of District Same Subject Education