Santosh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Santosh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 15, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046095

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046095
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Apr 15, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Santosh

Advocate Shri. B.J. Chourasiya

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c. no.4034/2013 15.4.2013 shri b.j. chourasiya, counsel for the applicant. shri chandrakant mishra, ga, for the state. heard finally. this is an application under section 439 of cr.p.c.the applicant is in custody since 14.1.2013 in connection with crime no.302/2012 registered at police station hindoriya, district damoh for offence punishable under sections 307, 452, 294, 436, 147, 148, 323 of ipc, section 25/27 of arms act and section 3(2)(v) of sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act. learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. injured has already been discharged from the hospital. all other coaccused persons have been released on bail. the applicant is in jail and trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant. learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer. on due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. the application is allowed. it is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.35,000/ (rupees thirty five thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court concerned, for his appearance before the said court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said court during trial. c.c. as per rules. (g.s. solanki) ravi judge

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C. No.4034/2013 15.4.2013 Shri B.J. Chourasiya, counsel for the applicant.

Shri Chandrakant Mishra, GA, for the State.

Heard finally.

This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.The applicant is in custody since 14.1.2013 in connection with Crime No.302/2012 registered at Police Station Hindoriya, District Damoh for offence punishable under Sections 307, 452, 294, 436, 147, 148, 323 of IPC, Section 25/27 of Arms Act and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. Injured has already been discharged from the hospital. All other coaccused persons have been released on bail. The applicant is in jail and trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer.

On due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The application is allowed.

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.35,000/ (Rupees thirty five thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Committal Court/Trial Court concerned, for his appearance before the said Court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said Court during trial.

C.C. as per rules.

(G.S. Solanki) ravi JUDGE

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Santosh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education