Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Premlal Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Premlal vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 15, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046090

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Premlal

Advocate Shri. Arun Paroha

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

criminal revision no.1540/2012 15.04.2013 shri arun paroha, counsel for the applicant. shri prakash gupta, panel lawyer for the respondent/state. heard on i.a.no.17673/2012, an application under section 5 of the limitation act. looking to the period of delay, application is allowed. the delay of three days in filing the present revision is hereby condoned. heard on admission. the applicant is convicted for the offences punishable under sections 452 and 323/34 (three counts) of ipc and sentenced with till rising the court with fine of rs.500/- for each counts. after considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the evidence adduced against the applicant, there are sufficient eyewitnesses, who have proved the guilt of the applicant and therefore, there is no illegality visible in the conviction directed by both the courts below for the offences punishable under sections 452 and 323/34 (three counts) of the ipc. so far as the sentence is concerned, both the courts below have already taken a lenient view and therefore, it is not possible for any further reduction of the sentence. no illegality is visible in the judgment passed by the courts below and therefore, there is reason by which the present revision can be accepted. consequently, the revision filed by the applicant is hereby dismissed at motion stage. a copy of this order be sent to the trial court as well as appellate court for information. (n.k.gupta) judge pnkj

Full Judgment

Criminal Revision No.1540/2012 15.04.2013 Shri Arun Paroha, counsel for the applicant.

Shri Prakash Gupta, Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State.

Heard on I.A.No.17673/2012, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

Looking to the period of delay, application is allowed.

The delay of three days in filing the present revision is hereby condoned.

Heard on admission.

The applicant is convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 452 and 323/34 (three counts) of IPC and sentenced with till rising the Court with fine of Rs.500/- for each counts.

After considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and the evidence adduced against the applicant, there are sufficient eyewitnesses, who have proved the guilt of the applicant and therefore, there is no illegality visible in the conviction directed by both the Courts below for the offences punishable under Sections 452 and 323/34 (three counts) of the IPC.

So far as the sentence is concerned, both the Courts below have already taken a lenient view and therefore, it is not possible for any further reduction of the sentence.

No illegality is visible in the judgment passed by the Courts below and therefore, there is reason by which the present revision can be accepted.

Consequently, the revision filed by the applicant is hereby dismissed at motion stage.

A copy of this order be sent to the trial Court as well as appellate Court for information.

(N.K.GUPTA) JUDGE pnkj

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial