Jitendra Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Jitendra Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jan 10, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1046022

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1046022
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jan 10, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jitendra Singh

Advocate Shri. S.K.Dubey

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.a.no.1446/2012 11.01.2013 shri s.k.dubey, learned counsel for the appellant. heard on the question of admission. this intra court appeal under section 2(1) of the madhya pradesh uchcha nyayalaya (khand nyayapeeth ko appeal) adhiniyam, 2005, has been filed against the order dated 4.12.2012 in writ petition no.17290/2012, by which the learned single judge has dismissed the writ petition on the ground of alternative remedy. after hearing the learned counsel for the appellant at length, we find no reason to interfere with the order under appeal as the learned single judge has observed that the petitioner has a remedy under section 154 read with section 201, 202 and 319 of cr.p.c.accordingly, there is no merit in the appeal. the same is dismissed. (s.a.bobde) (k.k.trivedi) chief justice judge. a.praj.

Full Judgment

W.A.No.1446/2012 11.01.2013 Shri S.K.Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant.

Heard on the question of admission.

This intra Court appeal under Section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, has been filed against the order dated 4.12.2012 in Writ Petition No.17290/2012, by which the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition on the ground of alternative remedy.

After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant at length, we find no reason to interfere with the order under appeal as the learned Single Judge has observed that the petitioner has a remedy under Section 154 read with Section 201, 202 and 319 of Cr.P.C.Accordingly, there is no merit in the appeal.

The same is dismissed.

(S.A.Bobde) (K.K.Trivedi) Chief Justice Judge.

A.Praj.

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Jitendra Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education