Narendra Kumar Khatik Vs. Ajit Keshari

Narendra Kumar Khatik vs Ajit Keshari

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided May 14, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045924

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1045924
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: May 14, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Narendra Kumar Khatik

Advocate Shri. S.D.Khan

Respondent

Ajit Keshari

Advocate Shri. K.K.Sahu

Excerpt

c.p.no.1905/12 14.05.2013 shri s.d.khan, learned counsel for the applicants. shri k.k.sahu, learned counsel for the respondents. heard. this contempt petition has been filed by the applicants alleging non-compliance and disobedience of the order passed by this court on 09.08.2012 in w.p.no.12058/12. the respondents have filed a return and have stated that on 24.2.2012 the petitioners have produced a patta before the authority which was thereafter considered and orders thereon were passed, therefore, the order passed by this court has been complied with. from a perusal of the order passed by the respondents annexure r/1, i am of the considered opinion that no case for initiating contempt proceedings is made out. the application being meritless is accordingly dismissed. (r.s.jha) judge msp

Full Judgment

C.P.No.1905/12 14.05.2013 Shri S.D.Khan, learned counsel for the applicants.

Shri K.K.Sahu, learned counsel for the respondents.

Heard.

This contempt petition has been filed by the applicants alleging non-compliance and disobedience of the order passed by this court on 09.08.2012 in W.P.No.12058/12.

The respondents have filed a return and have stated that on 24.2.2012 the petitioners have produced a Patta before the authority which was thereafter considered and orders thereon were passed, therefore, the order passed by this court has been complied with.

From a perusal of the order passed by the respondents Annexure R/1, I am of the considered opinion that no case for initiating contempt proceedings is made out.

The application being meritless is accordingly dismissed.

(R.S.Jha) Judge msp

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Narendra Kumar Khatik vs Ajit Keshari Same Subject Education