Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramkumar Verma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Ramkumar Verma vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Nov 26, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045813

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramkumar Verma

Advocate Smt. Sudha Gautam

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

ramkumar verma versus state of m.p.& ors.writ petition no.19825 ”26. 11.2012: smt. sudha gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner. smt. d.k.bohre, learned panel lawyer for the state. petitioner is subsequently holding the post of head master of government girls middle school krishnagar pawai, district panna. grievance of petitioner is that vide order dated 12.11.2012 passed by the district education officer charge of block education officer pawai is granted to respondent no.5. it is stated that respondent no.5 is junior to petitioner and in a circular issued by the state government on 7.9.2011, as contained in annexure p-2, it is clearly stipulated that charge of such post be given to seniormost person. interalia contending that petitioner is senior to respondent no.5, inspite thereof charge has not been granted to petitioner, petitioner has filed this writ petition. after representation in this regard submitted had fallen on deaf ears.referring to order passed under similar circumstances by this court in w.p.no.13321/2011 (s) (bakhat singh versus state of m.p.& ors.) decided on 10.8.2011 vide annexure p-6, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after such orders were passed by this court the charge has been given to senior most person under the same condition, as is evident from annexure p-7. taking note of aforesaid grievance of petitioner it is directed that the district education officer panna respondent no.4 shall reconsider the question of posting 2 of block education officer pawai after taking note of grievance of petitioner the representation submitted and orders passed under similar circumstances on earlier occasion as indicated hereinabove and decide the representation by a speaking order within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. with the aforesaid the petition stands disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-

Full Judgment

Ramkumar Verma versus State of M.P.& ORS.Writ Petition No.19825 ”

26. 11.2012: Smt.

Sudha Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Smt.

D.K.Bohre, learned Panel Lawyer for the State.

Petitioner is subsequently holding the post of Head Master of Government Girls Middle School Krishnagar Pawai, District Panna.

Grievance of petitioner is that vide order dated 12.11.2012 passed by the District Education Officer charge of Block Education Officer Pawai is granted to respondent No.5.

It is stated that respondent No.5 is junior to petitioner and in a circular issued by the State Government on 7.9.2011, as contained in Annexure P-2, it is clearly stipulated that charge of such post be given to seniormost person.

Interalia contending that petitioner is senior to respondent No.5, inspite thereof charge has not been granted to petitioner, petitioner has filed this writ petition.

After representation in this regard submitted had fallen on deaf eaRs.referring to order passed under similar circumstances by this Court in W.P.No.13321/2011 (s) (Bakhat Singh versus State of M.P.& Ors.) decided on 10.8.2011 vide Annexure P-6, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after such orders were passed by this court the charge has been given to senior most person under the same condition, as is evident from Annexure P-7.

Taking note of aforesaid grievance of petitioner it is directed that the District Education Officer Panna respondent No.4 shall reconsider the question of posting 2 of Block Education Officer Pawai after taking note of grievance of petitioner the representation submitted and orders passed under similar circumstances on earlier occasion as indicated hereinabove and decide the representation by a speaking order within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid the petition stands disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial